×

Search anything:

SQL vs SQLite vs NoSQL vs MySQL: A Comprehensive Comparison

Internship at OpenGenus

Get this book -> Problems on Array: For Interviews and Competitive Programming

Table of Contents:

  1. Introduction
  2. Table for Comparison of Database Technologies: MySQL, SQLite, SQL, and NoSQL
  3. How SQL Works
    • Scalability
    • Structure
    • Properties
    • Support
    • Examples of SQL Databases
  4. How NoSQL Works
    • Scalability
    • Structure
    • Properties
    • Support
    • Examples of NoSQL Databases
  5. How SQLite Works
    • Functionality
    • Architecture
    • Storage and Structure
    • Transaction Processing
    • Use Cases
  6. Comparison between SQL and NoSQL
    • Data Structure
    • Scalability and Performance
    • ACID Compliance
    • Use Cases
  7. Comparison between MySQL and SQLite
    • Data Structure
    • Scalability and Performance
    • ACID Compliance
    • Use Cases
  8. Summary

Introduction

When it comes to managing data, choosing the right database technology is crucial for efficient storage and retrieval. MYSQL and SQLite are two popular choices for developers, each offering unique advantages. Additionally, there is a broader distinction between SQL (Structured Query Language) and NoSQL (Not Only SQL) databases. In this article at OpenGenus, we will explore the differences and similarities between MYSQL, SQLite, SQL, and NoSQL, helping you make an informed decision based on your specific requirements.

MYSQL has been a prevalent method for accessing relational databases for several decades. It is widely known and familiar to those who work with databases. However, as the landscape of unstructured data, storage capabilities, processing power, and analytics requirements has evolved, newer database technologies like SQLite have emerged to address these changing use cases. SQLite is a lightweight database that offers its own unique advantages.

MYSQL and SQLite differ in several key aspects. MYSQL databases are relational, meaning they organize data into structured tables with predefined schemas. They excel in handling multi-row transactions and complex relationships between tables. Over the years, MYSQL databases have focused on reducing data duplication, making them efficient for storing and retrieving data stored in rows and tables.

On the other hand, SQLite is also a relational database management system, but it is known for its lightweight nature. It is designed to be embedded within applications, requiring minimal configuration and administration. SQLite databases are file-based and do not require a separate server process, making them easy to deploy and use. While they may not offer the same scalability as MYSQL, SQLite databases are suitable for small to medium-sized applications that prioritize simplicity and portability.

In addition to MYSQL and SQLite, there is a broader distinction between SQL and NoSQL databases. SQL databases, including MYSQL, are relational databases that organize data into structured tables. They are highly structured and excel in handling complex relationships between tables. On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational and offer more flexibility in terms of data structures. They do not rely on fixed rows and columns but rather allow different formats that best suit the data being stored. NoSQL databases offer greater scalability, faster data storage and retrieval, and are well-suited for handling unstructured or semi-structured data.

Overall, choosing between MYSQL, SQLite, SQL, and NoSQL depends on your specific needs and requirements. Consider factors such as data complexity, scalability, performance, and ease of use to determine the most suitable database technology for your project.

Comparison of Database Technologies: MySQL, SQLite, SQL, and NoSQL

Comparison Point MySQL SQLite SQL NoSQL
Database Type Relational Relational Relational Non-Relational
Application Suitability Medium to large-scale Small to medium-sized Medium to large-scale Large-scale and unstructured data
Performance and Scalability High performance and scalability Lightweight and easy deployment High performance and scalability High scalability and fast data handling
Server Process Requirement Requires separate server process Does not require separate server process Requires separate server process Does not require separate server process (implementation-dependent)
Advanced Features and Relationships Offers more advanced features and complex relationships between tables Offers more advanced features and complex relationships between tables Offers simplicity and portability Provides flexibility in data structures and efficient handling of unstructured or semi-structured data
Query Flexibility Supports SQL queries Supports SQL queries Supports SQL queries Varies (Some support SQL-like queries, others have custom query languages)
Data Structure Flexibility Structured (tabular) Structured (tabular) Structured (tabular) Flexible (unstructured or semi-structured)
Backup and Recovery Options Multiple options available (e.g., binary logs, full backups) Limited options (e.g., file-level copies) Multiple options available (e.g., full backups, transaction logs) Varies (Some provide built-in replication and backup mechanisms, others rely on external tools)
Cost Free and commercial versions available Free and public domain Free and commercial versions available Varies (Some open source, some commercial)
Example Databases Employee Management System, Online Store Mobile Apps, Embedded Systems MySQL, SQLite, MongoDB, Cassandra, Firebase DynamoDB, Couchbase, Elasticsearch

maxresdefault

How SQL Works

SQL databases are highly effective in managing structured data, which involves relationships between variables and entities. By employing a relational model, SQL databases excel in organizing and manipulating data with complex relationships.

Scalability
In terms of scalability, SQL databases primarily focus on vertical scalability. This means that you can increase the server's capacity by migrating to a larger server with enhanced CPU, RAM, or SSD capabilities. While vertical scalability is commonly utilized, SQL databases can also support horizontal scalability through techniques like sharding or partitioning, although such methods may not be as well-supported.

Structure
The schema of SQL databases organizes data in a structured, tabular format. It utilizes tables composed of columns or attributes and rows representing individual records. Due to the strict predefined schema of SQL databases, it is necessary to organize and structure data before integrating it into the SQL database.

Properties
Relational database management systems (RDBMS) that employ SQL must adhere to the ACID properties. ACID stands for Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability, which ensure the successful processing of transactions and maintain a high level of reliability. Atomicity guarantees that transactions either succeed completely or fail entirely, even in the event of system failure. Consistency ensures that the database follows rules to validate and prevent corruption at all stages. Isolation ensures that concurrent transactions do not interfere with one another. Durability ensures that transactions are permanent and unaffected by system failures.

Support
With the extensive history of SQL databases, they have amassed large communities and abundant examples of stable codebases available online. Consequently, there is a wealth of experts who can provide support for SQL and assist with programming relational data.

Examples of SQL Databases:

  1. Db2
  2. MySQL
  3. YugabyteDB
  4. CockroachDB
  5. Oracle Database
  6. Microsoft SQL Server
  7. Azure SQL Database

These are just a few examples of SQL databases widely used in various industries and applications. Each database has its own strengths and features that cater to specific use cases and requirements.

How NoSQL Works

Unlike SQL, NoSQL systems provide the flexibility to work with diverse data structures within a database. With a dynamic schema for unstructured data, there is less need for upfront data planning and organization, making it easier to make modifications. NoSQL databases allow the addition of new attributes and fields, and they support varied syntax across different databases.

Scalability
NoSQL databases excel in horizontal scalability, allowing for the addition of additional servers or nodes as needed to handle increased loads. This flexibility enables seamless distribution of data across multiple machines, enabling efficient scaling.

Structure
NoSQL databases do not adhere to a strict relational model and go beyond storing data solely in rows and tables. They generally fall into four main types of structures:

  1. Column-oriented: Data is stored in cells grouped in a virtually unlimited number of columns instead of rows. This structure is beneficial for large-scale data analytics and aggregation.
  2. Key-value stores: These databases use an associative array, also known as a dictionary or map, as their data model. Data is represented as a collection of key-value pairs, offering high-speed retrieval and simple data access.
  3. Document stores: Documents are used to hold and encode data in standard formats such as XML, YAML, JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), and BSON. A unique aspect is that documents within a single database can have different data types, providing flexibility in handling diverse data structures.
  4. Graph databases: These databases represent data using a graph structure that depicts relationships between different sets of data. They excel in managing highly interconnected data and performing complex graph-based queries.

Properties
While SQL databases follow ACID properties, NoSQL databases align with the CAP theorem. The CAP theorem states that distributed data systems can guarantee only two of the following three properties at any given time:

Consistency
Every request receives either the most recent result or an error. Some NoSQL databases, like MongoDB, offer strong consistency, while others, like Cassandra, provide eventual consistency.

Availability
Every request yields a non-error result, ensuring the system remains accessible even in the presence of failures or network partitions.

Partition tolerance
The system continues to operate seamlessly despite delays or losses in communication between nodes.

Support
NoSQL databases, although rapidly adopted, generally have smaller user communities and therefore may have less available support compared to SQL databases. However, many NoSQL databases benefit from open-source systems, providing opportunities for community-driven collaboration.

Examples of NoSQL Databases:

  1. Redis
  2. FaunaDB
  3. CouchDB
  4. MongoDB
  5. Cassandra
  6. Elasticsearch
  7. BigTable
  8. Neo4j
  9. HBase

These examples represent a diverse range of NoSQL databases, each with its own strengths and use cases. Selecting the appropriate NoSQL database depends on factors such as data structure, scalability needs, query requirements, and the specific characteristics of your application.

How SQLite Works

SQLite is a lightweight and self-contained relational database management system (RDBMS) that operates on a single file. It is renowned for its simplicity, portability, and versatility, making it a popular choice for embedded systems, mobile applications, and small-scale projects.

Functionality
Despite its compact size, SQLite offers a broad range of features and capabilities. It supports standard SQL syntax and provides a comprehensive set of data manipulation and querying operations. With SQLite, you can create, modify, and delete tables, indexes, and views, perform complex queries, and enforce data integrity constraints.

Architecture
SQLite follows a client-serverless architecture, meaning there is no separate server process handling database requests. Instead, the SQLite library directly accesses the database file. This design eliminates the need for a centralized server, simplifies deployment, and allows applications to interact with the database through function calls.

Storage and Structure
In SQLite, data is stored in a single file, typically with a .sqlite or .db extension. This file acts as a container for tables, indexes, and other database objects. The structure of an SQLite database is based on tables, similar to other SQL databases. Tables consist of columns that define the data types and rows that represent individual records.

Transaction Processing
SQLite provides transaction support to ensure data integrity and reliability. It employs a variant of the ACID properties known as "atomic commit and rollback." This means that each SQL statement is treated as a separate transaction, allowing you to commit changes or roll them back if needed. However, unlike some other SQL databases, SQLite does not support concurrent transactions from multiple connections.

Use Cases
Due to its lightweight nature and self-contained design, SQLite is commonly used in applications that require a local, embedded database. It is ideal for mobile apps, desktop applications, and small-scale web projects. SQLite is particularly suitable for scenarios where portability, simplicity, and ease of integration are essential.

Conclusion
SQLite offers a powerful yet lightweight solution for managing structured data. Its simplicity, portability, and self-contained nature make it an attractive choice for developers seeking an embedded database solution. With its support for standard SQL syntax, transaction processing, and versatile storage options, SQLite empowers developers to build efficient and reliable applications in various domains. Whether you are developing a mobile app or a small-scale project, SQLite can provide the functionality and flexibility you need.

Comparison between SQL and NoSQL

When comparing SQL and NoSQL databases, there are several key differences to consider. SQL and NoSQL represent two distinct database management systems with contrasting characteristics. SQL, or Structured Query Language, is a relational database approach that emphasizes data organization through predefined schemas, enforcing a rigid structure and ensuring data integrity. It excels in handling structured and consistent data, offering powerful querying capabilities. On the other hand, NoSQL, or Not Only SQL, embraces a non-relational, schema-less model, designed for scalability and flexibility. NoSQL databases can handle unstructured and semi-structured data, offering high performance and horizontal scalability at the expense of sacrificing some of the guarantees provided by SQL databases. Let's delve into each aspect and provide examples with comments to illustrate the disparities between the two.

A. Data Structure:

SQL databases, including SQLite, follow a structured, tabular format, where data is organized into tables with predefined columns and rows. This rigid structure ensures data integrity and enforces relationships through primary and foreign keys. It provides a consistent and organized approach to data storage and retrieval. On the other hand, NoSQL databases, such as MongoDB, employ flexible data models that can handle unstructured or semi-structured data. For example, in a document database like MongoDB, data can be stored in JSON-like documents without a fixed schema. This flexibility allows for dynamic and evolving data structures, making NoSQL databases suitable for scenarios where the data schema may vary or evolve over time.

Example comment:

-- SQL example: Creating a table with defined columns
CREATE TABLE users (
    id INT PRIMARY KEY,
    name VARCHAR(50),
    age INT
);

-- NoSQL example: Inserting a document in MongoDB with dynamic structure
db.users.insertOne({
    name: "John Doe",
    age: 30,
    address: {
        street: "123 Main St",
        city: "New York"
    }
});

B. Scalability and Performance:

SQL databases, including SQLite, are known for their ability to handle structured data and complex relationships efficiently. They are particularly well-suited for transactional systems that require ACID compliance, ensuring the reliability and integrity of data.

When it comes to scalability, SQL databases, including SQLite, primarily focus on vertical scalability. This means that as the workload increases, you can enhance the server's capacity by upgrading the hardware components such as CPU, RAM, or SSD. Vertical scalability allows SQL databases to efficiently handle increased data volume and user load by leveraging more powerful resources.

On the other hand, NoSQL databases prioritize horizontal scalability. They achieve this by distributing data across multiple servers or nodes, allowing for greater performance and scalability in scenarios involving large volumes of data or high traffic. NoSQL databases can effortlessly add more servers to the cluster, providing the flexibility to handle increasing workloads by scaling horizontally.

While SQL databases like SQLite excel in managing structured data and enforcing complex relationships, NoSQL databases are designed to handle unstructured or semi-structured data and offer superior performance for specific use cases. Depending on your application requirements and the nature of your data, you can choose between SQL and NoSQL databases to optimize scalability and performance accordingly.

Example comment:

-- SQL example: Retrieving data from multiple tables using JOIN
SELECT orders.order_id, customers.name
FROM orders
INNER JOIN customers ON orders.customer_id = customers.customer_id;

-- NoSQL example: Querying data from a document-based database
db.users.find({ age: { $gt: 25 } });

C. ACID Compliance:

SQL databases, including SQLite, are well-known for their adherence to the ACID principles, which ensure data consistency and reliability. ACID transactions provide strong guarantees that all operations within a transaction are executed successfully or rolled back if an error occurs. This level of transactional support ensures the integrity of the data stored in SQL databases, making them a reliable choice for applications that require strict data consistency.

On the other hand, NoSQL databases, including some variations of SQLite, often prioritize scalability and performance over strict ACID compliance. They may adopt BASE (Basically Available, Soft State, Eventually Consistent) principles, which provide a different trade-off between consistency and availability.

While SQL databases maintain strong consistency through ACID transactions, NoSQL databases may relax some of these requirements in favor of better scalability and performance. They prioritize availability, ensuring that the database remains accessible even in the presence of network partitions or hardware failures. NoSQL databases also embrace eventual consistency, which means that data changes are propagated and reconciled across distributed nodes over time, rather than instantly.

SQLite, although primarily an SQL database, offers some NoSQL capabilities by supporting unstructured data through its extension system. This allows developers to store and query JSON-like documents within the database, providing flexibility for handling semi-structured or schema-less data.

Ultimately, the choice between SQL databases like SQLite and NoSQL databases depends on the specific requirements of your application. If strict data consistency and reliability are critical, SQL databases with ACID compliance, such as SQLite, are the preferred option. However, if your application prioritizes scalability, performance, and flexible data models, NoSQL databases, including certain variations of SQLite, may be more suitable.

Example comment:

-- SQL example: Performing a transaction with multiple operations
START TRANSACTION;
UPDATE accounts SET balance = balance - 100 WHERE id = 1;
INSERT INTO transactions (account_id, amount) VALUES (1, 100);
COMMIT;

-- NoSQL example: Inserting data without transactions
db.transactions.insertOne({ account_id: 1, amount: 100 });
db.accounts.updateOne({ id: 1 }, { $inc: { balance: -100 } });

D. Use Cases:

SQL databases are well-suited for applications that require complex querying, strong data integrity, and transactions, such as e-commerce platforms or financial systems. NoSQL databases shine in scenarios where flexibility, scalability, and fast data retrieval are crucial, such as social media platforms, real-time analytics, or content management systems.

Example comment:

-- SQL use case: Retrieving a user's purchase history
SELECT orders.order_id, products.name, order_items.quantity
FROM orders
JOIN order_items ON orders.order_id = order_items.order_id
JOIN products ON order_items.product_id = products.product_id
WHERE orders.user_id = 123;

-- NoSQL use case: Storing user profiles with dynamic attributes
{
    _id: "user123",
    name: "John Doe",
    email: "john@example.com",
    age: 30,
    preferences: {
        language: "English",
        notifications
        email: true,
        push: true,
        sms: false
        },
        orders: [
        {
        order_id: "order1",
        date: "2023-05-20",
        total: 50.99,
        status: "delivered"
        },
        {
        order_id: "order2",
        date: "2023-05-25",
        total: 99.99,
        status: "processing"
        }
        ]
        }

In the above NoSQL example, the user document includes various attributes, such as name, email, age, preferences, and an array of orders. The flexible nature of NoSQL databases allows for dynamic additions and modifications to the user profile, which can be especially useful in applications where user attributes can vary widely.

By comparing the data structure, scalability, ACID compliance, and use cases between SQL and NoSQL databases, you can make an informed decision on which type of database is most suitable for your project. SQL databases provide a structured and reliable approach for managing complex relationships and ensuring data integrity, while NoSQL databases offer flexibility, scalability, and fast data retrieval for handling large amounts of unstructured data or rapidly changing requirements.

Comparison between MySQL and SQLite

When comparing MySQL and SQLite databases, there are several key differences to consider. Let's delve into each aspect and provide examples with comments to illustrate the disparities between the two.

A. Data Structure
MySQL and SQLite, both being SQL databases, follow a structured, tabular format where data is organized into tables with predefined columns and rows. This rigid structure ensures data integrity and enforces relationships through primary and foreign keys. It provides a consistent and organized approach to data storage and retrieval.

Example comment:

-- MySQL example: Creating a table with defined columns
CREATE TABLE users (
    id INT PRIMARY KEY,
    name VARCHAR(50),
    age INT
);

-- SQLite example: Creating a table with defined columns
CREATE TABLE users (
    id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
    name TEXT,
    age INTEGER
);

B. Scalability and Performance

MySQL and SQLite both excel in handling structured data and complex relationships efficiently. They are particularly well-suited for transactional systems that require ACID compliance, ensuring the reliability and integrity of data.

When it comes to scalability, MySQL and SQLite have different focuses. MySQL primarily focuses on vertical scalability, allowing you to enhance the server's capacity by upgrading hardware components such as CPU, RAM, or SSD as the workload increases. Vertical scalability allows MySQL databases to efficiently handle increased data volume and user load by leveraging more powerful resources.

On the other hand, SQLite, being a file-based database, does not support extensive scalability features like distributed data across multiple servers. It is typically used in scenarios where scalability requirements are modest or where the database size remains manageable.

While both MySQL and SQLite excel in managing structured data and enforcing complex relationships, MySQL databases are more suitable for large-scale applications that require extensive scalability and high-performance capabilities.

Example comment:

-- MySQL example: Retrieving data from multiple tables using JOIN
SELECT orders.order_id, customers.name
FROM orders
INNER JOIN customers ON orders.customer_id = customers.customer_id;

-- SQLite example: Retrieving data from multiple tables using JOIN
SELECT orders.order_id, customers.name
FROM orders
JOIN customers ON orders.customer_id = customers.customer_id;

C. ACID Compliance
Both MySQL and SQLite databases are well-known for their adherence to the ACID principles, which ensure data consistency and reliability. ACID transactions provide strong guarantees that all operations within a transaction are executed successfully or rolled back if an error occurs. This level of transactional support ensures the integrity of the data stored in SQL databases, making them a reliable choice for applications that require strict data consistency.

SQLite, being a serverless embedded database, offers full ACID compliance, providing the same transactional guarantees as MySQL. It supports concurrent access and ensures data consistency even in multi-user environments.

On the other hand, NoSQL databases often prioritize scalability and performance over strict ACID compliance. They may adopt BASE (Basically Available, Soft State, Eventually Consistent) principles, which provide a different trade-off between consistency and availability.

While both MySQL and SQLite maintain strong consistency through ACID transactions, NoSQL databases may relax some of these requirements in favor of better scalability and performance. They prioritize availability, ensuring that the database remains accessible even in the presence of network partitions or hardware failures. NoSQL databases also embrace eventual consistency, which means that data changes are propagated and reconciled across distributed nodes over time, rather than instantly.

Ultimately, the choice between MySQL and SQLite depends on the specific requirements of your application. If strict data consistency and reliability are critical, both MySQL and SQLite offer reliable options with ACID compliance. However, if your application prioritizes extensive scalability and high-performance capabilities, MySQL is more suitable.

Example comment:

-- MySQL example: Performing a transaction with multiple operations
START TRANSACTION;
UPDATE accounts SET balance = balance - 100 WHERE id = 1;
INSERT INTO transactions (account_id, amount) VALUES (1, 100);
COMMIT;

-- SQLite example: Performing a transaction with multiple operations
BEGIN;
UPDATE accounts SET balance = balance - 100 WHERE id = 1;
INSERT INTO transactions (account_id, amount) VALUES (1, 100);
COMMIT;

D. Use Cases
MySQL databases are well-suited for applications that require complex querying, strong data integrity, and transactions, such as e-commerce platforms or financial systems. Its scalability features make it suitable for handling large volumes of data and high traffic scenarios.

SQLite, on the other hand, is commonly used in scenarios where the database size remains relatively small or where scalability requirements are modest. It is often embedded within applications or used for local data storage. SQLite is suitable for mobile apps, small-scale applications, or situations where simplicity and portability are desired.

Example comment:

-- MySQL use case: Retrieving a user's purchase history
SELECT orders.order_id, products.name, order_items.quantity
FROM orders
JOIN order_items ON orders.order_id = order_items.order_id
JOIN products ON order_items.product_id = products.product_id
WHERE orders.user_id = 123;

-- SQLite use case: Retrieving a user's purchase history
SELECT orders.order_id, products.name, order_items.quantity
FROM orders
JOIN order_items ON orders.order_id = order_items.order_id
JOIN products ON order_items.product_id = products.product_id
WHERE orders.user_id = 123;

In the above examples, both MySQL and SQLite can perform complex queries to retrieve a user's purchase history by joining multiple tables.

By comparing the data structure, scalability, ACID compliance, and use cases between MySQL and SQLite databases, you can make an informed decision on which database is most suitable for your project. MySQL provides a robust and scalable solution for applications that require extensive scalability, complex relationships, and strict data consistency. On the other hand, SQLite offers simplicity, portability, and ACID compliance, making it suitable for smaller-scale applications or embedded scenarios.

Summary

In conclusion, SQL databases, including MySQL and SQLite, are known for their structured approach and excel in managing relational data with complex relationships. They offer vertical scalability, allowing for increased server capacity by upgrading hardware resources. SQL databases, such as MySQL and SQLite, also adhere to the ACID properties, ensuring reliable transaction processing and data integrity.

On the other hand, NoSQL databases provide flexibility in data structures and prioritize horizontal scalability. They encompass various types, including column-oriented, key-value stores, document stores, and graph databases, catering to diverse data needs. NoSQL databases are designed to handle large volumes of data and high traffic, making them suitable for scenarios where scalability and fast data retrieval are crucial.

When deciding between SQL and NoSQL databases, including MySQL and SQLite, several factors need to be considered. The data structure requirements, scalability needs, ACID compliance, and specific use cases should all be taken into account. SQL databases, like MySQL and SQLite, are well-suited for applications that require complex querying, strong data integrity, and transactional capabilities, such as e-commerce or financial systems. On the other hand, NoSQL databases, including certain variations of SQLite, shine in scenarios where flexibility, scalability, and fast data retrieval are essential, such as social media platforms or real-time analytics.

SQL vs SQLite vs NoSQL vs MySQL: A Comprehensive Comparison
Share this